|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
|
In board rooms and back-offices around the world, risk
management remains high on the corporate agenda. Whilst
this is positive, organisations need to achieve the right
balance between adequate control and good management.
Talking to senior risk management executives this month,
we have observed a trend towards a more pro-active
approach to risk management in an attempt to find a better
balance.
What's the right balance? That depends on the risk and how
risk averse your organisation is!
Enjoy this issue of InTouch
Tony Harb
Director, InConsult
|
|
|
Risk Management & Compliance Update |
|
|
·
According to a recent landmark ruling by the Australian
Industrial Relations Commission,
Employers cannot stop unions
entering workplaces and interviewing employees on their
premises to investigate a suspected breach of the
Workplace Relations Act.
·
Spyware
is quickly replacing junk email as the most pressing
security challenge facing internet users, Internet users
are coming under continual attack from malicious software
that infiltrates computers to steal passwords. In one
Australian company, a test of just 20 computers identified
1,200 spyware programs.
·
An Australian Financial Review survey of 25 leading chief
executives and 5 of Australia's most senior chairmen and
directors, found
widespread concern
over the excessive time and cost incurred in complying
with new rules. Whilst they were generally supportive, a
better balance is required.
·
7 of the 37 Initial Public Offers (IPO) made last year
have failed to meet projected returns in their prospectus,
further highlighting the
risk of poor IPO performance.
According to one adviser, one reason is that many good
businesses suffer trauma in the listing process,
management get caught up in paperwork and the essential of
day-to-day management overlooked.
·
According to Harvard Business School professor Krishna
Palepu, the recent wave of
corporate regulation
has done little to change the short-term focus of business
and investors, which was the "fundamental force" behind
recent collapses. He believes that draconian regulation
might lift compliance and produce "gold-plated" company
accounts, but it would not fix the deeper issues which
went to the heart of recent frauds and accounting games.
·
A trend is emerging to use project managers much earlier
in the planning cycle for new engineering ventures.
Increasingly,
risk management engineers
are involved in issues such as designing safety features
for the entire lifetime of a new plant, building or
installation.
·
ASIC will soon issue the guidelines to clarify Australia's
"principles-based" approach to
audit independence
and hopes they will minimise conflict with the detailed
"rules-based" US Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
|
|
|
Financial Services Brief |
|
|
·
According to the Commonwealth Bank, under the proposed
International Accounting Standards
all derivative financial instruments must be recognised on
the balance sheet, along with loan origination fees that
were expensed and amortised. The bank warned that
retained profits in the banking industry might have to be
substantially adjusted because of the transition to
international accounting standards.
·
APRA has taken a tough approach on the major banks'
preparations for
Basel 2.
It warned that some of the banks are "cutting it fine" and
advised that capital relief will be limited to a 10 per
cent reduction from current regulatory requirements..
·
Recent surveillance by ASIC found that the majority of
financial services companies have complied with tough new
FSRA laws
which became effective on March 11. Only 9% of 353
financial service licence-holders reviewed had a poor
report card and 45% had minor deficiencies The most
common flaws were inadequate cash-flow projections and not
establishing a breach register as part of the risk
management strategy requirements.
·
The National Australia Bank has changed its
risk management structure
following its $360 million foreign-exchange debacle and
the appointment of a new chief financial officer. New
reporting arrangements will also be introduced as Mr
Stewart admitted after the forex scandal that there were
no clear reporting lines and accountabilities between risk
management, operations and finance.
·
Although APRA has approved about 30 of the 34 remedial
measures required before NAB can trade forex options
again, APRA has made it clear to the NAB that it will not
get back its
licence to trade foreign currency
options until its new risk policies and trading procedures
have been thoroughly tested.
·
All of Australia's
listed general insurers
have reported strong profits. IAG $665M, QBE $320M,
Promina $204M and Suncorp $618M..
·
The
Combined Operating Ratio
for Australia's major insurers also improved. Wesfarmers
86.5%, IAG 90.7%, QBE 90.8% and Allianz 96.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One risk management system, across your entire
organisation, allowing risk evaluation, compliance
assessment, internal audit and risk reporting...I'd like
to see that!

To unsubscribe to InTouch,
Click
Here.
InConsult Pty Ltd · L8, 37-49 Pitt Street · Sydney NSW
2000
Tel: (+612) 8272 9393 · Fax: (+612) 8272 9377
© 2004 All rights reserved |
|
|
|
How do directors feel about the current regulatory
environment?
"We would spend five times as much time on corporate
governance nowadays than we would four or five years ago"
- Gerry Harvey, Harvey Norman executive chairman
"making sure we had all the relevant bits and pieces we needed
for the US and yet we only spent 2 days as a board worrying
about the future of the bank."
- Margaret Jackson, director ANZ
"Whereas before you would write the minutes as a record, now
... you say: what will this look like in two years time if the
brown stuff hits the fan; have we covered our backsides; we'd
better have the lawyers look at it,"
- Dick Warburton, Caltex chairman
Source: Australian Financial Review
- - - - - -
Sarbanes-Oxley
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
(SOX) may not apply to many Australian organisations, but
already there are signs of similar type regulations embedded
in a range of regulations from CLERP to ASX guidelines. What
is SOX about and how has it changed corporate America?
SOX is US based legislation that aims
to promote corporate responsibility, increase public
disclosure, improve the quality and transparency of financial
reporting and auditing,
by
requiring
CEO/CFO
to
certify all SEC periodic filings
including
financial statements.
As a result,
CEOs and CFOs will be more closely scrutinized.
SOX
strengthens
penalties for securities law,
increases penalties for corporate fraud convictions and
enhances protection for corporate whistleblowers.
When enacted, the costs of complying with the new rules were
downplayed.
But
two years later, business is
starting to complain that the rules are too costly.
-Audit
costs
have
increased
by
15-30
%
- A large business will spend more than 12,000 people hours
complying with SOX
- Each company will pay, on average, for an extra 3,000
external people hours
- The cost of external consulting, software and other vendor
changes will average
US$732,000
But beware, some ASX requirements go further and require CEOs
and CFOs to vouch for risk management over the whole year and
the inclusion of joint ventures and other associated companies
in a firm's risk management procedures.
Whether it's SOX, ASX guidelines, CLERP or FSRA, risk
management and compliance is about understanding the business,
business processes and regulatory requirements. Clearly,
organisations need a smarter way to manage their risk
management strategy and compliance programs.
- - - - - -
Feedback
How can we improve your InTouch newsletter?
>> email us with feedback
Past Issues
>> Issue 1
>> Issue 2
>> Issue 3
|